Codex configuration still includes `disable_response_storage = true`
Quick fix
No verified fix is available. A PR proposes removing disable_response_storage from generation paths, but its merge or release is unconfirmed.
Symptom
Section titled “Symptom”最新稳定版 v3.20.3 及当前 main 的多个实际生成路径仍包含 `disable_response_storage = true`,容易让用户误以为它仍是可控制服务端回复存储的有效开关,也给配置排查和清理增加歧义。Multiple actual generation paths in the latest stable version v3.20.3 and current main still include `disable_response_storage = true`. This can mislead users into thinking it remains a valid switch for controlling server-side response storage and adds ambiguity to configuration troubleshooting and cleanup.
According to the report, upstream Codex removed the disable_response_storage setting and sets store directly to false in Responses requests. CC Switch 3.20.3 and the main commit reviewed in the report still generate the obsolete field through custom provider templates, third-party presets, unified providers, and deeplink imports. The field therefore cannot provide the corresponding storage control in current Codex. The report is based on source inspection, without GUI regression testing or observed startup or request failures caused by this field. A later comment reports an ignored-setting warning.
A commenter said they submitted PR #7556 to clean up generation paths and related previews, examples, and documentation while preserving compatibility with reading the old key in existing configurations. This is a submitted fix proposal; the supplied discussion does not confirm a merge, release, or successful user verification. The issue remains open.
Identify this as an obsolete configuration generation issue. The thread does not establish that it causes startup or request failures, and the field cannot be treated as a valid storage control switch in current Codex.
The thread provides no verified fix. Follow PR #7556 mentioned in issue #7524 to confirm whether the generation cleanup has been merged and released. The current discussion provides no fix version to recommend.
Distinguish new configuration generation from migration of existing configurations. The proposal submitted in the comments preserves existing configurations and compatibility with reading the old key. It does not claim to automatically remove the field from existing configurations.
Affected Versions
Section titled “Affected Versions”Source Issues
Section titled “Source Issues”This page is distilled from 1 real issues
(No FAQ yet)
Related problems
Section titled “Related problems”This is an unofficial community wiki with no affiliation to the cc-switch authors or the project itself. Its content is compiled from the project's public GitHub issues. This site distributes no software.